Yes Bank Ltd. has unveiled its latest shareholding reports, covering the quarter and the first half of the fiscal year ending on (Q4-Mar 2023-2024).This comprehensive report offers a deep dive into the company’s shareholding landscape, including details on Promoters, promoter groups, Foreign investors, public investors, and government entities. Through meticulous comparative analysis, it tracks the evolution of shareholding percentages and quantities, highlighting any shifts in ownership dynamics. Investors gain invaluable insights into the company’s ownership structure and the evolving investment landscape.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quater Quantity(In Crores) | Current Quater Quantity(In Crores) | Previous Quater Shares(in %) | Current Quater Shares(in %) | Quater to Quater Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoters | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Public | 2,876.16 | 2,876.79 | 34.01 | 36.26 | +2.25 % |
| DII | 1,213.82 | 1,200.53 | 42.2 | 41.73 | -0.47 % |
| FII | 684.28 | 633.07 | 23.79 | 22.01 | -1.78 % |
| Government | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Promoters shareholding remained stable, at 0% in both December 2023 and March 2024. This indicates that the promoters’ control over the company did not change during this period. The percentage of shares held by the public increased from 34.01% in December 2023 to 36.26% in March 2024.This change suggests that the public’s investment in the company grew during the quarter.Domestic Institutional Investor’s (DII) shareholding decreased slightly from 42.2% in December 2023 to 41.73% in March 2024 , indicating that domestic institutions reduced their -0.47000000000001 stake in the company.FIIs (Foreign Institutional Investors) shareholding decreased from 23.79% in December 2023 to 22.01% in March 2024 ,indicating that foreign institutions reduced their investments by 1.5% in the company during the quarter. This suggests a pullback in their investment .During quater from December 2023 to March 2024, Goverenment ownership remained steady at 0%.This indicates that the government’s stake in the company remained consistent during this period.
Let’s delve deeper into the statistics of the investors, which could have contributed to the fluctuations in the shareholding pattern.
“ “
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity (In Crores) | Current Quarter Quantity (In Crores) | Previous Quater Shares (in %) | Current Quater Shares (in %) | Quater-to-Quater Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital up to Rs. 2 lakhs | 635.900 | 701.281 | 22.11 | 24.38 | + 2.27 % |
| Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital in excess of Rs. 2 lakhs | 211.990 | 215.525 | 7.37 | 7.49 | + 0.12 % |
| Non Resident Indians (NRIs) | 42.075 | 42.684 | 1.46 | 1.48 | + 0.02 % |
| Bodies Corporate | 59.726 | 55.782 | 2.08 | 1.94 | -0.14 % |
| Any Other (specify) | 28.127 | 27.681 | 0.98 | 0.96 | -0.02 % |
| HUF | 27.931 | 27.577 | 0.97 | 0.96 | -0.01 % |
Spearheading a savvy charge towards increased profitability, Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital up to Rs. 2 lakhs lifts the bar with a remarkable 2.27 % enhancement in net profit, revealing adroit resource allocation and sharpened commercial instincts.Spearheading a savvy charge towards increased profitability, Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital in excess of Rs. 2 lakhs lifts the bar with a remarkable 0.12 % enhancement in net profit, revealing adroit resource allocation and sharpened commercial instincts.Spearheading a savvy charge towards increased profitability, Non Resident Indians (NRIs) lifts the bar with a remarkable 0.02 % enhancement in net profit, revealing adroit resource allocation and sharpened commercial instincts.Observations indicate a sizeable -0.14 % variance in Bodies Corporate’s fiscal performance between quarters, necessitating thorough investigation of salient aspects to enable future-proof strategies centered around lasting development.Observations indicate a sizeable -0.02 % variance in Any Other (specify)’s fiscal performance between quarters, necessitating thorough investigation of salient aspects to enable future-proof strategies centered around lasting development.Observations indicate a sizeable -0.01 % variance in HUF’s fiscal performance between quarters, necessitating thorough investigation of salient aspects to enable future-proof strategies centered around lasting development.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity (In Crores) | Current Quarter Quantity (In Crores) | Previous Quater Shares (in %) | Current Quater Shares (in %) | Quater-to-Quater Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mutual Funds/ | 4.007 | 5.379 | 0.14 | 0.19 | + 0.05 % |
| Banks | 1,070.668 | 1,057.057 | 37.23 | 36.74 | -0.49 % |
| AXIS BANK LIMITED | 45.171 | 31.561 | 1.57 | 1.1 | -0.47 % |
| Insurance Companies | 132.423 | 131.277 | 4.6 | 4.56 | -0.04 % |
| NBFCs registered with RBI | 6.141 | 6.237 | 0.21 | 0.22 | + 0.01 % |
The latest quarter saw a considerable enhancement in profitability for Mutual Funds/, reflecting an uptick of 0.05 % in their net earnings. Such an outcome implies the successful implementation of sound cost optimization techniques and increased income sources, ultimately highlighting the favorable effect of the investor on the corporation’s overall monetary welfare.Banks decreased their stake from 36.74% in the previous quarter to 37.23% in the current quarter. It describes a decrease in stakes over consecutive quarters, specifically by -0.49 %.AXIS BANK LIMITED decreased their stake from 1.1% in the previous quarter to 1.57% in the current quarter. It describes a decrease in stakes over consecutive quarters, specifically by -0.47 %.Insurance Companies decreased their stake from 4.56% in the previous quarter to 4.6% in the current quarter. It describes a decrease in stakes over consecutive quarters, specifically by -0.04 %.The latest quarter saw a considerable enhancement in profitability for NBFCs registered with RBI, reflecting an uptick of 0.01 % in their net earnings. Such an outcome implies the successful implementation of sound cost optimization techniques and increased income sources, ultimately highlighting the favorable effect of the investor on the corporation’s overall monetary welfare.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity (In Crores) | Current Quarter Quantity (In Crores) | Previous Quater Shares (in %) | Current Quater Shares (in %) | Quater-to-Quater Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign Direct Investment | 369.616 | 306.234 | 12.85 | 10.64 | -2.21 % |
| CA BASQUE INVESTMENTS | 184.808 | 145.808 | 6.43 | 5.07 | -1.36 % |
| VERVENTA HOLDINGS LTD | 184.808 | 160.426 | 6.43 | 5.58 | -0.85 % |
| Foreign Portfolio Investors Category I | 308.420 | 319.488 | 10.72 | 11.11 | + 0.39 % |
| Foreign Portfolio Investors Category II | 6.248 | 7.346 | 0.22 | 0.26 | + 0.04 % |
Profitability dwindled by -2.21 % for Foreign Direct Investment in comparison to the preceding quarter. To secure a foundation for prospective sustainable progress, investigating the factors prompting this decline is vital.Profitability dwindled by -1.36 % for CA BASQUE INVESTMENTS in comparison to the preceding quarter. To secure a foundation for prospective sustainable progress, investigating the factors prompting this decline is vital.Profitability dwindled by -0.85 % for VERVENTA HOLDINGS LTD in comparison to the preceding quarter. To secure a foundation for prospective sustainable progress, investigating the factors prompting this decline is vital.During this past quarter, there was a noteworthy upswing in profitability for Foreign Portfolio Investors Category I, which experienced a significant increase of 0.39 % in net profit.During this past quarter, there was a noteworthy upswing in profitability for Foreign Portfolio Investors Category II, which experienced a significant increase of 0.04 % in net profit.
