![[fetch_key]](https://stocktradeupdates.com/wp-content/uploads/new_logos/PRAXIS.png)
Share the post "Praxis Home Retail Shareholding pattern FY(Q3-Dec 2024-2025)"
Shareholding results summarize the composition of a company’s shareholder base, revealing how ownership is distributed among various investors. This information is crucial for assessing the level of institutional and retail investment in the company. By examining shareholding results, analysts can gauge investor sentiment and the potential impact on stock performance. Praxis Home Retail has released its latest shareholding reports, covering the third quarter and the fiscal year ending on (Q3-Dec 2024-2025).This detailed report examines who owns shares, including Promoters, promoter groups, Foreign investors, public investors, and government entities.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity | Current Quarter Quantity | Previous Quarter Shares(in %) | Current Quarter Shares(in %) | Quarter to Quarter Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoters | 3.55 Cr | 3.55 Cr | 28.35 | 26.26 | -2.09 % |
| Public | 8.97 Cr | 9.97 Cr | 69.23 | 71.5 | +2.27 % |
| DII | 6.40 Lakh | 6.40 Lakh | 0.51 | 0.47 | -0.04 % |
| FII | 23.95 Lakh | 23.95 Lakh | 1.91 | 1.77 | -0.14 % |
| Government | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Promoters’ shareholding decreased from 28.35% in September 2024- to 26.26% in December 2024-. This reduction indicates that the promoters’ control over Company has weakened during this period.The percentage of shares held by the public increased from 69.23% in September 2024-2025 to 71.5% in December 2024-2025.This change suggests that the public’s investment in the company grew during the quarter.Domestic Institutional Investor’s (DII) shareholding decreased slightly from 0.51% in September 2024- to 0.47% in December 2024 , indicating that domestic institutions reduced their -0.04 stake in the company.FIIs (Foreign Institutional Investors) shareholding decreased from 1.91% in September 2024- to 1.77% in December 2024 ,indicating that foreign institutions reduced their investments by 1.5% in the company during the quarter. This suggests a pullback in their investment .
Let’s look into the statistics of the investors, which could have contributed to the fluctuations in the shareholding pattern.
Below is a detailed table presenting the shareholding percentage of Promoters.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity | Current Quarter Quantity | Previous Quarter Shares (in %) | Current Quarter Shares (in %) | Quarter-to-Quarter Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avni Kishorkumar Biyani | 46.72 Lakh | 46.72 Lakh | 3.73 | 3.46 | -0.27 % |
| Sangita Kishore Biyani | 23.03 Lakh | 23.03 Lakh | 1.84 | 1.7 | -0.14 % |
| Surplus Finvest | 2.81 Cr | 2.81 Cr | 22.44 | 20.78 | -1.66 % |
| Future Corporate Resources | 4.16 Lakh | 4.16 Lakh | 0.33 | 0.31 | -0.02 % |
Avni Kishorkumar Biyani faced a downturn in stakeholding this quarter, witnessing a decline of -0.27 % in stakeholding compared to the previous quarter.Sangita Kishore Biyani faced a downturn in stakeholding this quarter, witnessing a decline of -0.14 % in stakeholding compared to the previous quarter.Surplus Finvest faced a downturn in stakeholding this quarter, witnessing a decline of -1.66 % in stakeholding compared to the previous quarter.Future Corporate Resources faced a downturn in stakeholding this quarter, witnessing a decline of -0.02 % in stakeholding compared to the previous quarter.
Below is a detailed table showcasing the public shareholding percentage.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity | Current Quarter Quantity | Previous Quarter Shares (in %) | Current Quarter Shares (in %) | Quarter-to-Quarter Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Key Managerial Personnel | 1.12 Lakh | 1.12 Lakh | 0.09 | 0.08 | -0.01 % |
| Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital up to Rs. 2 lakhs | 1.03 Cr | 1.15 Cr | 8.24 | 8.54 | + 0.3 % |
| Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital in excess of Rs. 2 lakhs | 3.51 Cr | 4.52 Cr | 27.99 | 33.4 | + 5.41 % |
| Subhash Phootarmal Rathod | 44.48 Lakh | 44.33 Lakh | 3.55 | 3.28 | -0.27 % |
| Saral Bhanshali | 16.74 Lakh | 16.74 Lakh | 1.34 | 1.24 | -0.1 % |
| Meenu Bhanshali | 41.79 Lakh | 41.79 Lakh | 3.34 | 3.09 | -0.25 % |
| Mangal Bhanshali | 23.70 Lakh | 23.70 Lakh | 1.89 | 1.75 | -0.14 % |
| Akash Bhanshali | 39.75 Lakh | 39.75 Lakh | 3.17 | 2.94 | -0.23 % |
| Mathew Cyriac | 0 | 1.00 Cr | 0 | 7.41 | +7.41% |
| Non Resident Indians (NRIs) | 16.76 Lakh | 18.73 Lakh | 1.34 | 1.39 | + 0.05 % |
| Bodies Corporate | 3.34 Cr | 3.16 Cr | 26.7 | 23.38 | -3.32 % |
| Laxminarayan Vyapaar | 16.00 Lakh | 16.00 Lakh | 1.28 | 1.18 | -0.1 % |
| Bennett, Coleman And Company | 21.86 Lakh | 21.86 Lakh | 1.75 | 1.62 | -0.13 % |
| Brescon Ventures | 24.30 Lakh | 24.30 Lakh | 1.94 | 1.8 | -0.14 % |
| Johnson Dye Works | 26.51 Lakh | 23.69 Lakh | 2.12 | 1.75 | -0.37 % |
| Infotech Era (India) | 33.56 Lakh | 33.56 Lakh | 2.68 | 2.48 | -0.2 % |
| Blue Daimond Properties | 35.56 Lakh | 35.56 Lakh | 2.84 | 2.63 | -0.21 % |
| New Era Fabrics | 36.35 Lakh | 36.35 Lakh | 2.9 | 2.69 | -0.21 % |
| Universal Trustees | 90.00 Lakh | 77.63 Lakh | 7.19 | 5.74 | -1.45 % |
| Any Other (specify) | 60.86 Lakh | 63.68 Lakh | 4.86 | 4.71 | -0.15 % |
| HUF | 17.56 Lakh | 19.98 Lakh | 1.4 | 1.48 | + 0.08 % |
| First Rank LLP | 36.11 Lakh | 36.11 Lakh | 2.88 | 2.67 | -0.21 % |
| LLP | 6.92 Lakh | 7.32 Lakh | 0.55 | 0.54 | -0.01 % |
Observations show a significant difference of -0.01 % in Key Managerial Personnel’s financial performance between quarters.Leading the way to higher stakeholding, Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital up to Rs. 2 lakhs has significantly boosted stakeholding by an impressive 0.3 %.Leading the way to higher stakeholding, Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital in excess of Rs. 2 lakhs has significantly boosted stakeholding by an impressive 5.41 %.Observations show a significant difference of -0.27 % in Subhash Phootarmal Rathod’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.1 % in Saral Bhanshali’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.25 % in Meenu Bhanshali’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.14 % in Mangal Bhanshali’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.23 % in Akash Bhanshali’s financial performance between quarters.Leading the way to higher stakeholding, Non Resident Indians (NRIs) has significantly boosted stakeholding by an impressive 0.05 %.Observations show a significant difference of -3.32 % in Bodies Corporate’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.1 % in Laxminarayan Vyapaar’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.13 % in Bennett, Coleman And Company’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.14 % in Brescon Ventures’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.37 % in Johnson Dye Works’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.2 % in Infotech Era (India)’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.21 % in Blue Daimond Properties’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.21 % in New Era Fabrics’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -1.45 % in Universal Trustees’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.15 % in Any Other (specify)’s financial performance between quarters.Leading the way to higher stakeholding, HUF has significantly boosted stakeholding by an impressive 0.08 %.Observations show a significant difference of -0.21 % in First Rank LLP’s financial performance between quarters.Observations show a significant difference of -0.01 % in LLP’s financial performance between quarters.Mathew Cyriac had no shares in the previous quarter but now holds 7.41% of shares in the current quarter.
Below is a detailed table presenting the shareholding percentage of DIIs.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity | Current Quarter Quantity | Previous Quarter Shares (in %) | Current Quarter Shares (in %) | Quarter-to-Quarter Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alternate Investment Funds | 4.88 Lakh | 4.88 Lakh | 0.39 | 0.36 | -0.03 % |
| Insurance Companies | 1.52 Lakh | 1.52 Lakh | 0.12 | 0.11 | -0.01 % |
Alternate Investment Funds decreased their stake from 0.36% in the previous quarter to 0.39% in the current quarter.It describes a decrease in stakes over consecutive quarters, specifically by -0.03 %.Insurance Companies decreased their stake from 0.11% in the previous quarter to 0.12% in the current quarter.It describes a decrease in stakes over consecutive quarters, specifically by -0.01 %.
The table below displays the shareholding percentage of FIIs.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity | Current Quarter Quantity | Previous Quarter Shares (in %) | Current Quarter Shares (in %) | Quarter-to-Quarter Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign Portfolio Investors Category I | 23.95 Lakh | 23.95 Lakh | 1.91 | 1.77 | -0.14 % |
| India Opportunities Growth Fund – Pinewood Strategy | 23.93 Lakh | 23.93 Lakh | 1.91 | 1.77 | -0.14 % |
Stakeholding dwindled by -0.14 % for Foreign Portfolio Investors Category I in comparison to the preceding quarter.Stakeholding dwindled by -0.14 % for India Opportunities Growth Fund – Pinewood Strategy in comparison to the preceding quarter.
[my_shortcode1 values=”Praxis Home Retail”]
![[fetch_key]](https://stocktradeupdates.com/wp-content/uploads/new_logos/FAZE3Q.png)
![[fetch_key]](https://stocktradeupdates.com/wp-content/uploads/new_logos/BSOFT.png)
![[fetch_key]](https://stocktradeupdates.com/wp-content/uploads/new_logos/EPACK.png)