![[fetch_key]](https://stocktradeupdates.com/wp-content/uploads/new_logos/ISFT.png)
Share the post "Intrasoft Technologies Shareholding pattern FY(Q2-Sep 2024-2025)"
Shareholding results refer to the distribution of ownership stakes in a company as disclosed in financial reports. These results provide insights into who holds shares, including institutional and retail investors, and can indicate trends in investor confidence. Analyzing shareholding results helps stakeholders understand the company’s ownership dynamics and potential market influence. Intrasoft Technologies has released its latest shareholding reports, covering the Second quarter and the fiscal year ending on (Q2-Sep 2024-2025).This detailed report examines who owns shares, including Promoters, promoter groups, Foreign investors, public investors, and government entities.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity | Current Quarter Quantity | Previous Quarter Shares(in %) | Current Quarter Shares(in %) | Quarter to Quarter Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoters | 70.24 Lakh | 70.24 Lakh | 43.06 | 43.06 | 0 |
| Public | 92.87 Lakh | 92.87 Lakh | 56.86 | 56.84 | -0.02 % |
| DII | 1.53 K | 1.53 K | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 |
| FII | 11.03 K | 15.33 K | 0.07 | 0.09 | +0.02 % |
| Government | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Promoters shareholding remained stable, at 43.06% in both June 2024 and September 2024. This indicates that the promoters’ control over the company did not change during this period. The percentage of shares held by the public decreased from 56.86% in June 2024 to 56.84% in September 2024.This reduction indicates that the public’s stake in the company diminished during this period.DIIs (Domestic Institutional Investors) shareholding remained unchanged at 0.01% from June 2024 to September 2024. This indicates that domestic institutions maintained their investment level in the company. FIIs (Foreign Institutional Investors): There was a significant increase from 0.07% in June 2024 to 0.09% in September 2024. This suggests that foreign institutions grew their investments 0.02 in the company during the quarter.
Let’s look into the statistics of the investors, which could have contributed to the fluctuations in the shareholding pattern.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity | Current Quarter Quantity | Previous Quarter Shares (in %) | Current Quarter Shares (in %) | Quarter-to-Quarter Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital up to Rs. 2 lakhs | 32.57 Lakh | 32.68 Lakh | 19.97 | 20.04 | + 0.07 % |
| Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital in excess of Rs. 2 lakhs | 17.41 Lakh | 16.16 Lakh | 10.68 | 9.91 | -0.77 % |
| Non Resident Indians (NRIs) | 3.68 Lakh | 3.98 Lakh | 2.26 | 2.44 | + 0.18 % |
| Bodies Corporate | 28.89 Lakh | 29.55 Lakh | 17.71 | 18.12 | + 0.41 % |
| Titanic Manufacturing Company | 2.00 Lakh | 1.80 Lakh | 1.23 | 1.1 | -0.13 % |
| Orchid Commotrade | 0 | 2.32 Lakh | 0 | 1.42 | +1.42% |
| Salsett Vinimay | 0 | 11.99 Lakh | 0 | 7.35 | +7.35% |
| Any Other (specify) | 10.10 Lakh | 10.24 Lakh | 6.19 | 6.28 | + 0.09 % |
| LLP | 11.65 K | 7.25 K | 0.07 | 0.04 | -0.03 % |
| HUF | 9.98 Lakh | 10.16 Lakh | 6.12 | 6.23 | + 0.11 % |
| Salsett Vinmay | 11.99 Lakh | 0 | 7.35 | 0 | -7.35% |
Leading the way to higher stakeholding, Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital up to Rs. 2 lakhs has significantly boosted stakeholding by an impressive 0.07 %.Observations show a significant difference of -0.77 % in Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital in excess of Rs. 2 lakhs’s financial performance between quarters.Leading the way to higher stakeholding, Non Resident Indians (NRIs) has significantly boosted stakeholding by an impressive 0.18 %.Leading the way to higher stakeholding, Bodies Corporate has significantly boosted stakeholding by an impressive 0.41 %.Observations show a significant difference of -0.13 % in Titanic Manufacturing Company’s financial performance between quarters.Leading the way to higher stakeholding, Any Other (specify) has significantly boosted stakeholding by an impressive 0.09 %.Observations show a significant difference of -0.03 % in LLP’s financial performance between quarters.Leading the way to higher stakeholding, HUF has significantly boosted stakeholding by an impressive 0.11 %.Orchid Commotrade had no shares in the previous quarter but now holds 1.42% of shares in the current quarter.Salsett Vinimay had no shares in the previous quarter but now holds 7.35% of shares in the current quarter.Salsett Vinmay had 7.35% of shares in the previous quarter but exited in the current quarter.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity | Current Quarter Quantity | Previous Quarter Shares (in %) | Current Quarter Shares (in %) | Quarter-to-Quarter Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign Portfolio Investors Category I | 11.03 K | 13.22 K | 0.07 | 0.08 | + 0.01 % |
| Foreign Portfolio Investors Category II | 0 | 2.11 K | 0 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
During this past quarter, there was a noteworthy upswing in stakeholding for Foreign Portfolio Investors Category I, which experienced a significant increase of 0.01 % .Foreign Portfolio Investors Category II had no shares in the previous fiii quarter but now holds 0.01% of shares in the current quarter.
-5
3-Year Profit
15
5-Year Profit
24
10-Year Profit
140
Current Price
229
Market Cap
Upon examining the financial data for BSE code 533181, it becomes clear that the company achieved a notable five-year profit of 15 percents, which impressively increased to -5 percents in the three-year window. This upward trajectory, however, has been overshadowed by the latest trailing twelve-month (TTM) figures, which indicate a concerning loss of 40 percents. This financial loss is further compounded by the fact that the company has not recorded any sales across any of the timeframes under consideration. Such an unusual situation might suggest that the company operates under an unconventional business model, which could potentially carry higher risks. In terms of stock performance, the company’s stock price has seen a decline, falling from 11 percents over the five-year period to just 13 percents in the last year. The ten-year average stock price, which sits at 10 percents, highlights long-term volatility, casting doubt on the company's ability to sustain its market position over time. This warrants further investigation into the factors driving these fluctuations.
The company currently holds a market cap of ₹229 crore, with its stock trading at ₹140. Historically, the stock has fluctuated between ₹192 / 108, reflecting its performance in response to market dynamics and various economic factors. The company's Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio stands at 21.3, indicating that the stock is perceived as highly valued by the market, possibly driven by expectations of future earnings growth. The book value per share is ₹130, which offers insight into the company's intrinsic worth, while its dividend yield of 0.00% provides a steady return for long-term investors. Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) is 7.67%, showcasing the company’s ability to generate profits from its capital investments. Return on Equity (ROE) is 5.06%, highlighting how efficiently the company uses shareholder funds to generate profits. The debt-to-equity ratio is very low at 0.66, which is a positive indicator of financial stability. However, the company’s net cash flow of ₹-2.23 crore raises concerns about its liquidity position. The Piotroski score of 8.00 reflects the company’s overall financial health, while the Graham Number of ₹142 suggests the stock's intrinsic value. Despite these factors, the Price-to-Book (P/B) ratio of 1.07 indicates that the stock is trading at a premium to its book value, which might imply market optimism about the company's future growth prospects.
![[fetch_key]](https://stocktradeupdates.com/wp-content/uploads/shareholding/stock-market-green-red-candle-sticks-u8sypn2sbm22a0y3.jpg)