DCW Ltd., has unveiled its latest shareholding reports, covering the quarter and the first half of the fiscal year ending on (Q4-Mar 2023-2024).This comprehensive report offers a deep dive into the company’s shareholding landscape, including details on Promoters, promoter groups, Foreign investors, public investors, and government entities. Through meticulous comparative analysis, it tracks the evolution of shareholding percentages and quantities, highlighting any shifts in ownership dynamics. Investors gain invaluable insights into the company’s ownership structure and the evolving investment landscape.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quater Quantity(In Crores) | Current Quater Quantity(In Crores) | Previous Quater Shares(in %) | Current Quater Shares(in %) | Quater to Quater Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Promoters | 13.31 | 13.01 | 45.1 | 44.08 | -1.02 % |
| Public | 16.21 | 16.51 | 47.01 | 48.64 | +1.63 % |
| DII | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0 |
| FII | 2.32 | 2.14 | 7.87 | 7.26 | -0.61 % |
| Government | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Promoters’ shareholding decreased from 45.1% in December 2023 to 44.08% in March 2024. This reduction indicates that the promoters’ control over Company has weakened during this period.The percentage of shares held by the public increased from 47.01% in December 2023 to 48.64% in March 2024.This change suggests that the public’s investment in the company grew during the quarter.DIIs (Domestic Institutional Investors) shareholding remained unchanged at 0.02% from December 2023 to March 2024. This indicates that domestic institutions maintained their investment level in the company. FIIs (Foreign Institutional Investors) shareholding decreased from 7.87% in December 2023 to 7.26% in March 2024 ,indicating that foreign institutions reduced their investments by 1.5% in the company during the quarter. This suggests a pullback in their investment .During quater from December 2023 to March 2024, Goverenment ownership remained steady at 0%.This indicates that the government’s stake in the company remained consistent during this period.
Let’s delve deeper into the statistics of the investors, which could have contributed to the fluctuations in the shareholding pattern.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity (In crores) | Current Quarter Quantity (In crores) | Previous Quarter Shares (in %) | Current Quarter Shares (in %) | Quarter-to-Quarter Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUDIT JAIN | 0.858 | 0.558 | 2.91 | 1.89 | -1.02 % |
| MEETA JAIN | 0.621 | 0.602 | 2.1 | 2.04 | -0.06 % |
| RIMA SAATVIK JAIN | 0.526 | 0.546 | 1.78 | 1.85 | + 0.07 % |
| JAIN SAHU BROTHERS PROPERTIES LLP | 0 | 0.072 | 0 | 0.24 | +0.24% |
| JAIN SAHU BROTHERS PROPERTIES PVT LTD | 0.072 | 0 | 0.24 | 0 | -0.24% |
MUDIT JAIN faced a downturn in profitability this quarter, witnessing a decline of -1.02 % in profits compared to the previous quarter. Delving into the underlying factors driving this shift is crucial for charting a path towards sustained financial growth.MEETA JAIN faced a downturn in profitability this quarter, witnessing a decline of -0.06 % in profits compared to the previous quarter. Delving into the underlying factors driving this shift is crucial for charting a path towards sustained financial growth.RIMA SAATVIK JAIN has showcased a remarkable improvement in profitability for this quarter, registering a significant increase of 0.07 % in net profit. This signifies adept cost management strategies, amplified revenue streams, or a harmonious blend of both, underscoring the shareholder’s positive impact on the company’s financial health.JAIN SAHU BROTHERS PROPERTIES LLP had no shares in the previous quarter but now holds 0.24% of shares in the current quarter.JAIN SAHU BROTHERS PROPERTIES PVT LTD had 0.24% of shares in the previous quarter but exited in the current quarter.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity (In Crores) | Current Quarter Quantity (In Crores) | Previous Quater Shares (in %) | Current Quater Shares (in %) | Quater-to-Quater Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital up to Rs. 2 lakhs | 8.671 | 9.669 | 29.38 | 32.76 | + 3.38 % |
| Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital in excess of Rs. 2 lakhs | 2.017 | 1.498 | 6.83 | 5.07 | -1.76 % |
| Non Resident Indians (NRIs) | 0.168 | 0.181 | 0.57 | 0.61 | + 0.04 % |
| Bodies Corporate | 2.025 | 2.047 | 6.86 | 6.94 | + 0.08 % |
| PP VENTURES LLP | 0.500 | 0.579 | 1.69 | 1.96 | + 0.27 % |
| Any Other (specify) | 0.706 | 0.675 | 2.39 | 2.29 | -0.1 % |
| HUF | 0.589 | 0.583 | 2 | 1.97 | -0.03 % |
| Clearing Members | 0.117 | 0.092 | 0.4 | 0.31 | -0.09 % |
Spearheading a savvy charge towards increased profitability, Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital up to Rs. 2 lakhs lifts the bar with a remarkable 3.38 % enhancement in net profit, revealing adroit resource allocation and sharpened commercial instincts.Observations indicate a sizeable -1.76 % variance in Resident Individuals holding nominal share capital in excess of Rs. 2 lakhs’s fiscal performance between quarters, necessitating thorough investigation of salient aspects to enable future-proof strategies centered around lasting development.Spearheading a savvy charge towards increased profitability, Non Resident Indians (NRIs) lifts the bar with a remarkable 0.04 % enhancement in net profit, revealing adroit resource allocation and sharpened commercial instincts.Spearheading a savvy charge towards increased profitability, Bodies Corporate lifts the bar with a remarkable 0.08 % enhancement in net profit, revealing adroit resource allocation and sharpened commercial instincts.Spearheading a savvy charge towards increased profitability, PP VENTURES LLP lifts the bar with a remarkable 0.27 % enhancement in net profit, revealing adroit resource allocation and sharpened commercial instincts.Observations indicate a sizeable -0.1 % variance in Any Other (specify)’s fiscal performance between quarters, necessitating thorough investigation of salient aspects to enable future-proof strategies centered around lasting development.Observations indicate a sizeable -0.03 % variance in HUF’s fiscal performance between quarters, necessitating thorough investigation of salient aspects to enable future-proof strategies centered around lasting development.Observations indicate a sizeable -0.09 % variance in Clearing Members’s fiscal performance between quarters, necessitating thorough investigation of salient aspects to enable future-proof strategies centered around lasting development.
| Shareholder Name | Previous Quarter Quantity (In Crores) | Current Quarter Quantity (In Crores) | Previous Quater Shares (in %) | Current Quater Shares (in %) | Quater-to-Quater Difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foreign Portfolio Investors Category I | 2.323 | 2.141 | 7.87 | 7.25 | -0.62 % |
| LTS INVESTMENT FUND LTD | 0.496 | 0.406 | 1.68 | 1.38 | -0.3 % |
| ERISKA INVESTMENT FUND LTD | 1.024 | 1.180 | 3.47 | 4 | + 0.53 % |
| LOTUS GLOBAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED | 0.445 | 0 | 1.51 | 0 | -1.51% |
Profitability dwindled by -0.62 % for Foreign Portfolio Investors Category I in comparison to the preceding quarter. To secure a foundation for prospective sustainable progress, investigating the factors prompting this decline is vital.Profitability dwindled by -0.3 % for LTS INVESTMENT FUND LTD in comparison to the preceding quarter. To secure a foundation for prospective sustainable progress, investigating the factors prompting this decline is vital.During this past quarter, there was a noteworthy upswing in profitability for ERISKA INVESTMENT FUND LTD, which experienced a significant increase of 0.53 % in net profit.LOTUS GLOBAL INVESTMENTS LIMITED had 1.51% of shares in the previous quarter but exited in the current quarter.